James Francis Edward Stuart
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and PovertyJames Francis Edward Stuart, the Old Pretender, was the son of James II and a Stuart claimant to the English Crown. Recognized as the lawful heir by France, Spain, the pope, and Jacobite supporters in England and Scotland, he tried in 1708 to recover the throne with French military support. His failure did not end the Stuart restoration cause: further Jacobite revolts followed, and his son Charles Edward Stuart made another unsuccessful bid in 1745–46. Their defeats reveal the durability, but not the uncontested nature, of the settlement established by the Glorious Revolution.
Claim and Stuart Restoration
After James II died in 1701, his son James Francis Edward Stuart was treated by foreign supporters and English and Scottish Jacobites as the lawful heir to the Crown. That recognition placed a continuing dynastic challenge alongside the new political order created by the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The Stuart cause was therefore not merely a question of succession: it represented an attempt to restore a monarchy whose removal had helped produce a more pluralistic distribution of political power.
The 1708 Attempt
In 1708, James Francis Edward Stuart attempted to retake the throne with the support of French troops. The effort failed. The episode shows the claim moving from recognition to armed action, but the evidence records neither a successful restoration nor a change in the political settlement. Instead, the failed attempt became one installment in a prolonged contest over whether the Stuarts could return.
Revolts and Defeat of the Claim
The restoration efforts continued after the 1708 failure. Jacobite revolts broke out in 1715 and 1719, and in 1745–46 James Francis Edward Stuart’s son, Charles Edward Stuart, led a further attempt to recover the throne. The British army defeated his forces. The sequence extended the political life of the Old Pretender’s claim through another generation, while its repeated failures showed that dynastic legitimacy and foreign backing did not suffice to reverse the post-1688 settlement.
Political Significance
The Stuart challenge unfolded within a political system whose power was divided among competing interests. After the Glorious Revolution, no single group among the merchants, industrialists, gentry, and aristocracy was strong enough to impose its will alone. The Whigs, who represented new mercantile and economic interests and had been central to the Revolution, dominated Parliament from 1714 to 1760, but their power was checked by the rival Tory Party and by institutions designed to prevent a new absolutism and a Stuart return. The Old Pretender’s failed bid and the later defeat of his son’s forces belong to this wider pattern: restoration remained an active aim, but the pluralistic order built after 1688 made the recovery of unilateral royal authority difficult.